London, UK — July 16, 2025
The corporate scandal surrounding CEO Andy Byron and HR Director Kristin Cabot has taken yet another explosive turn — as investigators have now confirmed the identity of the man who controlled the concert camera that captured the now-viral footage of the two in an intimate moment.
The individual behind the lens? Elliot Grant, a senior AV technician — and shockingly, a former employee of Byron’s company, quietly laid off during internal restructuring just eight months ago.
Sources close to the investigation say Elliot was contracted as part of the external media team managing camera feeds for the private executive section at the luxury concert venue in Surrey. He was in charge of side-stage visuals and had direct access to internal camera angles — including one trained on the VIP box where Byron and Cabot were seated.
But what raised immediate suspicion was the timing: Elliot reportedly zoomed in and saved the footage just moments before the two shared their intimate exchange, suggesting intent and premeditation.
Insiders now allege that Elliot may have recognized Byron and acted out of personal grievance.
“This wasn’t an accident,” said a source with knowledge of the incident. “He knew who he was filming. And he made sure it was recorded and saved.”
Further investigation revealed that Elliot had posted cryptic messages on social media months prior, alluding to betrayal and corporate injustice. One now-deleted tweet read: “Some of you in suits think you’re untouchable. Cameras don’t lie.”
Neither Byron nor Cabot has commented on the identity of the cameraman, though their legal team is reportedly preparing to file civil charges for invasion of privacy and malicious intent.
Meanwhile, the public continues to rally behind Byron’s wife, whose quiet yet cutting five-word remark to Cabot — “You don’t get to win” — has become a viral anthem of strength across the UK.
As for Elliot Grant, he has not spoken publicly — but sources say he has retained legal counsel and insists that “the truth needed to come out.”
Whether this was revenge, whistleblowing, or something more personal, one thing is certain: the man behind the camera didn’t just expose an affair — he ignited a firestorm.